belching and unauthorized behaviour in offices, discuss
Irrefutable, the topic of belching and unauthorized behaviour in offices has become a heated debate among professionals. Although many people assert that such kind of actions leads to non-professional life, the others refute this proposal. This essay will discuss the negatives of belching and unauthorized behaviour in organizations and reach a logical conclusion.
There are many factors which ascertain why modern offices should not tolerate unhealthy responses from employees in which the most important one will be that these can only lead to disturbance during work. Moreover, people don't like colleagues who often present such an unprofessional attitude. For instance, a recent survey revealed that about 50% of performances of workers disturb yearly by these behaviours. Apparently, unauthorized actions play a detrimental impact on companies.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument would be that it is a big cause for attention diverts thereby leading the less progress for the organization. Furthermore, it will spread disease which definitely affects the health of other co-workers. For example, a study showed that about 50% of the employees in organizations remained absent due to ill-health caused by co-workers. Consequently, belching has a negative impact on offices.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the negative impacts of belching and unauthorized behaviours in offices in terms of spreading diseases and disturbing others. Therefore, in my opinion, professional organizations should not allow should unethical traits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 223, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...sturbance during work. Moreover, people dont like colleagues who often present such ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82378854626 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24468404296 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643171806167 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9688442818 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.692307692 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4615384615 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.25397266985 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258801329893 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998903385996 0.0925447433944 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138912032568 0.071462118173 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162549465356 0.151781067708 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120739338909 0.0609392437508 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.1260098522 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.18 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.