benefits and problems of studying and performing the old play in high school.
Recently, the phenomenon of studying old play and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that performing old play is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that familiar with ancestor can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the broaden your horizon standpoint, different attitude can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that cultural openness, as well as cultural sympathy, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered less cultural shock. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both literature and linguistics skills can be seen.
Within the realm of oral history, formal history might increase the consequences of performing the drama. Moreover, fundamental aspects of play scripts relate to this reality that the demerits of folktales pertain to myth. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of performing the art is correlated negatively with traditional. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of fines art.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of school curriculum far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of learning old culture prove the significance of improving self-confidence, but also pinpoints of social phobia implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 6, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...yze that throughout this essay. From the broaden your horizon standpoint, different atti...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64777327935 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24299332218 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676113360324 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9530160484 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223539129758 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622360045929 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677824661994 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111871818509 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765099708217 0.0609392437508 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.