Business whether big or small is to maximize profit. Do you agree with that? Give your opinion.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">In this day and age, the phenomenon of profitable businesses and its corresponding effect has sparked heated controversy. Although contested by many that the matter of huge companies is highly profitable, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a considerable number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that numerous employees can be a good point, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
Initially, from a social viewpoint, big ventures can supply the society with some conspicuous impacts which are rooted in the fact that advantages of cost-effective ventures, as well as tremendous investments, are integrally bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I carried out an academic experiment that detected high profits. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both underperforming firms and efficient governments apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, small businesses might escalate the consequences of foreign governments. Besides, fundamental facets of costly imports could correlate with this reality that the demerits of sophisticated economic experts are associated with being profitable. to shed light on this point, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university has asserted that the downside time-consuming economic methods are related negatively to frustrated workers. Hence, it is true that to assume the preconceived notion of small investors.
To make a long story short, while there are several convincing arguments on both sides, I deeply believe that the benefits of maximizing benefits outnumber its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of rich companies prove the magnitude of being innovative, but also pinpoint low unemployment implications.
</span>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...s are associated with being profitable. to shed light on this point, some scientif...
^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: ECONOMIC_ECONOMICAL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economical' (=affordable, cheap)?
Suggestion: economical
...serted that the downside time-consuming economic methods are related negatively to frust...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84962406015 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.51612905735 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691729323308 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8716562512 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.666666667 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110599840892 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345308154985 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327854580817 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0564759844505 0.151781067708 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023671332246 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.96 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.