Can political stability hurt economic growth?
Recently, the phenomenon of political stability and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of peaceful politic is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that regulated policy can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, internal political sustainability can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of permanent political manner, as well as financial policy, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered outstanding advantages about economic improvement. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both economic development and low-cost lifestyle apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, economic bankrupt might increase the consequence of unstable political behavior. Moreover, fundamental aspects of decreasing rates would relate to this reality that the demerits of lack of financial indications pertain to expensive trading. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of inappropriate politics are correlated negatively with inflation increasingly rate. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of high expense life.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of sustainable governmental politics in finical affaire far weigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of low-cost goods provide prove the significance of booming economic process, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92775665399 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28630191072 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680608365019 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2340062436 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.916666667 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234751991925 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723420517557 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499910562202 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124372426548 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435155876842 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.34 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.