Certain type of music affects young children’s learning. Researchers have researched on it. Some people agree and some disagree. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of "the certain type of music affects young children’s learning" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that the presence of music might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the effect of music can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the learning standpoint, the role of a certain type of music on children's learning can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that promoting the process of learning and education are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of music in the life of children. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both the ability of learning and music instinct distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, the effects of the certain type of music on learning of children might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of children's self-esteem. Moreover, fundamental aspects of music can relate to the reality that the demerits of the improper type of music can pertain to the lack of knowledge. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of the psychological effects of harsh music were correlated positively with children's behaviors, the local authorities would ultimately address mental problems of children. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of lyrics.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of the certain type of music on children's learning far outweigh its downsides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 31.9359605911 157% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53872053872 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19313718965 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572390572391 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.1718492806 50.4703680194 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.545454545 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298125366053 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989989303199 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619201976644 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169476110049 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365876598317 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.