For children, use films to study is as important as study literature. What is your opinion on this statement? Give
your reasons and use examples to support.
Recently, the phenomenon of utilizing some educational movies for the youths and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate among the populations. Although this idea is beneficial as it regarded by the substantial number of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that this way of instructing can be plus as it could develop some brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, the importance of instructing the young generation by displayed schemes is as the same as the other theoretical ways like literature. This way has several advantages, and from my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered these benefits. Firstly, this way has the potential of omitting the dull sense of theoretical courses. Hence, the youngsters have moe propensity to engage in these sessions. Furthermore, according to recent esearch undertaken by a prestigious university, the pupills' efficiency is enhanced by watching these films. Moreover, it is crystal clear that learning by observation is more effective than listening to tutors.
On the one hand, there is no doubt, accepting the same importance of learning by movies and theoretical ways like literature has some opponents. These dwellers asserted that watching films can diminish the concentration and leads to diminish the quality. In addition, they argue that it is quite difficult to provide films for all educational subjects.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the merits of considering the way of studying by films or some other courses like literature as the same importance are far more outweigh their demerits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14230215128 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592727272727 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8055628414 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.923076923 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111650996207 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350610793491 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0271483488961 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0686384713456 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170476470116 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.