Cities are now expanding; the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of making a better network for public transport and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of road transport is highly beneficial, such argument is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that rail transport can be a plus, and I will analyze that through this essay.
From a social standpoint, building more roads can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of traffic lights, as well as heavy traffic, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered a road accident. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both transportation cost and transport requirements apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, facilitating car ownership might increase the consequences of using highways. Moreover, fundamental aspects of a dangerous road could relate to this reality that the demerits of the transportation system pertain to using buses. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of urban transportation services is correlated negatively with building a highway. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of private transport.
To conclude, while there are several arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of public transport facilities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of road vehicles prove the significance of road improvements, but also pinpoint transport legislation implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31506111218 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653846153846 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.917536525 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.416666667 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218441394183 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718429126459 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467991077369 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120180935289 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271401476224 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.