Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss.
Recently, the phenomenon of spending too much time at work and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of working conditions is highly beneficial, such argument is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that job satisfaction can be a plus, and I will analyze that through this essay.
From a social standpoint, not having time for personal life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of leisure time, as well as leisure facilities, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered job opportunities. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both an assembly line worker and a construction worker apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, working for long hours might increase the consequences of a talented workforce. Moreover, fundamental aspects of a workaholic person could relate to this reality that the demerits of a casual work pertain to a successful career. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of a busy schedule is correlated negatively with personal habits. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of a healthy life
To conclude, while there are several arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of sparing time for leisure activities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a seasonal worker prove the significance of hard working person, but also pinpoint human resources implications.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 55 | view |
2019-12-27 | richierich25 | 85 | view |
2019-11-23 | priyankavs23 | 77 | view |
2019-11-23 | priyankavs23 | 77 | view |
2019-07-17 | minhaz | 85 | view |
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons of this change. 85
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 88
- The claim that animals have “rights” has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree? 77
- The environment we live in is in danger due to various global problems. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible for solving it? What measures? 85
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38745387454 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19494552547 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649446494465 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6068487146 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.727272727 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248570736359 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772335752418 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825941774851 0.071462118173 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130268747853 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203641773522 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.