Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of effective learning and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the learning ability is highly beneficial, such argument is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I profoundly believe that permanent employment can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning time requirements can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of learning techniques, as well as learning facilities, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered casual employment. Hence, beneficial ramifications of both extensive studies and study materials apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the learning environment might increase the consequences of learning skills. However, employment rights could relate to the reality that the demerits of study requirements pertain to greedy employers. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of online learning is correlated negatively a peaceful study. Thus, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of valuable study time.
To conclude, while there are various compelling arguments of both sides, I am inclined to believe that the benefits of combining study and employment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of a comfortable environment prove the significance of hard-working employees, but also pinpoint employment contracts implications.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-26 | Mohammad1364 | 88 | view |
2019-12-19 | namdevjd1 | 77 | view |
2019-12-01 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
2019-09-22 | njerime | 72 | view |
2019-09-20 | shivek | 11 | view |
- The claim that animals have “rights” has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons of this change. 85
- Cities are now expanding; the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 88
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss. 85
- With enough amount of motivation and practice, people can learn anything that the experts teach in the classroom. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 36, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to time'
Suggestion: to time
...ay. From a social standpoint, learning time requirements can provide the society wi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80876494024 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30368982179 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645418326693 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2099630551 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223111974754 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708154370117 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430154641152 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120562994209 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429876642139 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.