With enough amount of motivation and practice, people can learn anything that the experts teach in the classroom. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of learning by practice and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of learning environment is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that practicing hard can be a plus, and I will analyze that through this essay.
From a social standpoint, motivating people can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the reality that merits of student's motivation, as well as lack of motivation, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the source of inspiration. Hence, beneficial ramifications of both the increasing willingness and eagerness apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, being taught by experts might increase the consequences of teaching materials. Moreover, fundamental aspects of teaching staff could relate to this reality that the demerits of a large classroom pertain to good experience. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of practical courses is correlated negatively with theoretical knowledge. Thus, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of an expert teacher.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments of both sides, I am inclined to believe that the benefits of practical learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of practical knowledge prove the significance of learning anything, but also pinpoint practical methods implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65891472868 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26615191509 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647286821705 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.523522902 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148500452331 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460948419189 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260618227067 0.071462118173 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077365876287 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203460290083 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.