The claim that animals have “rights” has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of animal rights and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of animal behavior is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that forbidding hunting can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, animal conservation can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of pet shops, as well as pet owners, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered animal lovers. Hence, beneficial ramifications of both opting an animal and animal feeding apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, protecting animals might increase the consequences of having rights. Fundamental aspects of animal protection law could relate to this reality that the demerits of animal laboratories pertain to medical tests on animals. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of using animals correlated negatively with animal loyalty. Thus, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of wild animals.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of animal rights movement far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of an important issue prove the significance of animal farm, but also pinpoint healthy animal implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52777777778 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10081660503 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650793650794 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.921711581 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.083333333 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.25397266985 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190979962616 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716179811817 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390291988519 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116027491842 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184669249023 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.