Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons of this change.
Recently, the phenomenon of significant changes in communication and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of useful communication technologies is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am intended to believe that good communication skills can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, communication methods can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of communication costs, as well as communication facilities, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the need for communication. Hence, beneficial ramifications of both communication abilities and communication courses are inextricably bound up.
Within the realm of science, different communication technologies might increase the consequences of rapid changes. Moreover, fundamental aspects of sudden changes could relate to this reality that the demerits of communication quality pertain to fast data transmissions. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of real-time communications is correlated negatively with the communication speed. Thus, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of effective communication.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of diversity in communication methods far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of communication engineering prove the significance of telecommunication services, but also pinpoint poor communication implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 5.75862068966 365% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1007751938 5.00649968141 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.74618368396 2.71678728327 138% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635658914729 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.57093596059 127% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.354161419 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.166666667 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200673501461 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074351265573 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489468365283 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123657707461 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022034648805 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 16.32 53.1260098522 31% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.1 11.5310837438 157% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.