The environment we live in is in danger due to various global problems. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible for solving it? What measures?
Recently, the phenomenon of living in the environment and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of environmental legislation is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that environmental studies can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, different global problems can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of environmental issues, as well as major problems, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered ecological problems. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both solving a problem and the environmental science apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, destroying the environment might increase the consequences of environment-friendly products. Moreover, fundamental aspects of protecting the environment could relate to this reality that the demerits of a healthy environment pertain to general problems. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of an environmental factor is correlated negatively with living environments. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of polluting the environment.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of environmental problems far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of conserving the environment prove the significance of environmental elements, but also pinpoint environmentalists implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95736434109 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.65339428838 2.71678728327 134% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635658914729 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6600916816 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.083333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0969370985034 0.242375264174 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349071148472 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314834960589 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0543575446037 0.151781067708 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286088393902 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.