As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward to creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.
Nowadays, it is increasingly acknowledged that the traffic problem is one of the biggest issues which governments are facing. While some people believe that building more roads will be the solution, others advocate that public transport is what the official department should promote. As far as I am concerned, creating a better network of the public transportation system will be more beneficial in respect of this issue.
People who emphasize the importance that governments should build more roads in cities are primarily focusing on the function of the freeways. They argue that building more freeways can reduce congestion in urban areas. Nevertheless, this argument does not hold water. This is because most people work in the suburb close to where they live. However, congestion is a traffic problem in downtowns instead of rural areas which the freeway may play a role.
It is evidently reasonable for me to believe that the public transport system has more advantages. The main justification of this view is that it decreases the road congestion problem in the city. If more people travel by train, tram or bus, there are fewer cars we will have on the road, thus saves the times which people spend on commuting and resolves traffic jams. For instance, in the past few years, I spent more than an hour driving from workplace to home. However, since the railways are built in my city this year, I just cost half time than before to commuting by taking the train.
In a nutshell, although this controversial topic never fails to attract public attention, we may safely reach the conclusion that there is a need for governments to put money on developing the public transport network instead of building more roads.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01041666667 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69562322082 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579861111111 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3161886083 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.071428571 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35714285714 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280803113239 0.242375264174 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884251258372 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733893472833 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168223340163 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443710145273 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 12.6369458128 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.