The claim that animals have “rights” has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree?
Some people are not in favor that animals’ natural rights should be promulgated and has been the topic of preposition starting from the mid-20th century. I definitely support to prohibit the operation of zoos due to the adverse effects they provide to the animals and exploitation of their physical attributes for personal interest.
To begin with, animals should be treated fairly as humans do because they are also created by God. Legally speaking, shelters such as zoos are just giving the animals too much stress on their environment. They are usually seen to reside on a cage since birth. The natural process of animal development entails a domain that is rich with vegetation and forestry in order to grow well. Moreover, those several species are also subjected to series of experiments just for the sake of research for the ultimate alternative to human studies.
Apart from this, zoos should be condemned to closing of its business as they have entrance fees and other charges for viewing and playing with the animals that reflects exploitation. This strategy does not value the lives of the animals wherein they are only used for personal gain and profit. For instance, a multitude of specie keeping facilities are owned by private individuals as well as the government.
To recapitulate, taking away the animals from their natural habitat is a great deal of torture from them. They have the right to live well in their own means of hunting and reproducing. Zoos should be banned as they only restrict these animals freedom.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...d be banned as they only restrict these animals freedom.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, well, apart from, for instance, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05859375 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65826841971 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59765625 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8372419328 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6153846154 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275852294204 0.242375264174 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976332841194 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740714120475 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173742086059 0.151781067708 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360070887175 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.