The claim that animals have “rights” has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree?

Since the 1970s, there is an ongoing debate between people about whether the non-human animal should have rights or not. While it is possible to claim that animal should have right because they are like human. They can feel and react towards the problem. On the contrary, some people think that animal is inferior to humans. So that they can’t share the same rights. In contrast to this debate, there is a serious issue related to the existence of zoos and how animals are being treated in zoos. Some people are asking whether zoos are helping or hurting animals. Even some people are asking that should zoos be banned. In my opinion, sometimes zoo help the animals, but sometimes it hurt also.

There are reasons why zoos hurt because keeping animals in cages deprive them of their freedom and liberty. By which, they suffer physically and mentally. That is same as hurting them.

On the flip side, zoos help in the international breeding program for endangered spices. Also, zoos take care of sick and lost animals by well-educated zoo members. In this case, they are not hurting animals, rather they are helping them.

To conclude, I believe that being kept animals in small artificial environment differ animals to animals. An accurate study should be done on whether animals are being hurt or not in zoos because everyone has same right to live independently in their natural habitats.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 695, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...help the animals, but sometimes it hurt also. There are reasons why zoos hurt bec...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, while, even so, in contrast, in contrast to, in my opinion, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93670886076 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35951389257 2.71678728327 87% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552742616034 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.5024630542 63% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7193792913 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.8235294118 104.977214359 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9411764706 20.9669160288 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 2.75862068966 362% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393402278545 0.242375264174 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11990776614 0.0925447433944 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066559145702 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228681787146 0.151781067708 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819009318826 0.0609392437508 134% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 12.6369458128 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.9458128079 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 11.5310837438 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.32886699507 91% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 55.0591133005 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.3980295567 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.