The claim that animals have “rights” has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree?
It has been the topic of arguments since the 1970s that animals have their own rights. Several proponents believe that zoos are only harming the animals. I completely agree with this statement and zoos should be disallowed because of its negative impact on the animals and the inhibition of their proper development. This essay will discuss my justifications for the stated reasons.
To begin with, the existence of animal protections laws in various nations aims to eliminate undesirable environment for these species. To give emphasis, numerous zoo trainors are conducting intensive trainings on animals such as snakes, monkeys, lion, tiger and so on just to make a wonderful show for the tourists. However good the intentions are, they are still compromised of the life they must have outside the zoos. Consequently, behaviors of these creatures are negatively affected because they are commanded to do things against their natural will.
Apart from this, great attention should be given on prohibiting the operation of zoos as this will only restrict the full potential of animal growth. For example, mammals, reptiles, and amphibians require conducive environment for their development. Natural habitats such as in forest, lakes and mountains are highly recommended for them to mature. Hence, forcing them to inhabit unnatural dwellings would eventually lead them to poor health.
To recapitulate, the fact that zoo animals have their natural privilege to live peacefully in their abode should not be taken away from them. Indeed, zoos must be eradicated to help protect wildlife creatures to live well.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, so, still, well, apart from, for example, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.395256917 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7900099199 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632411067194 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9702497467 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22873365957 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768975113015 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720664317214 0.071462118173 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15013172358 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681275559099 0.0609392437508 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.