The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970’s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned?
In the informational era, the advancements of animals' rights and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although many people contest that zoos are preventing animals from the harsh environment and animals, others disagree with this proposition. This essay will discuss the indispensable aspects of zoos in helping our animals.
Firstly, zoos have saved many species of animals that were rapidly decreasing in population. Moreover, there are many animals in the zoos that got injured during the catastrophic events. As a tangible example, I recently visited a zoo that was containing Koala bears and their story written on the board that they got injured during an incident and after proper treatment they kept in the zoo. Manifestly, zoos are protecting animals from the outside danger environment.
Secondly, zoos are providing all facilities to the animals that are not available in the forest. Furthermore, They get the food without searching for prey and get the proper check up and medication on regular basis. To cite a practical instance, I watched a BBC documentary on Canada's zoos in which it showed that the government made strict rules and regulations for a zoo to give proper facilities and environment to the animals. Evidently, if proper nourishment and environment will not offer to the animals then a zoo will lose an animal which is a financial loss of the zoo.
In conclusion, this essay discussed that zoos are helping animals by providing proper facilities and saving them from outside harsh environment. Therefore, I staunchly opine that the government should give financial support to the zoos so that they will give more facilities and flexible environment to animals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 241, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... example, I recently visited a zoo that was containing Koala bears and their story written on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 585, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l which is a financial loss of the zoo. In conclusion, this essay discussed that...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34558823529 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0069034613 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536764705882 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.727910738 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.846153846 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298531992759 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127447059155 0.0925447433944 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541555162492 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193776637718 0.151781067708 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029210751462 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.