Working employees have paid leaves. Is it good or bad?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that working employees should get paid leaves. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that paid leaves can not only contribute to create good understanding among family members but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy, and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication, and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of paid leaves.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of paid leaves are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94979079498 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83075962403 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581589958159 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.521577094 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.545454545 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135696395047 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537059055233 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747899669827 0.071462118173 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775982779216 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299863740648 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.