Climate change and about the roles that Government. Corporate and Individuals can play to improve it.
Nowadays, whether individuals or authorities are held responsible for mitigating clime change, has attracted numerous controversies and drawn the attention from the public. Although contested by many that governments should take actions in this regard, a substantial number of individuals hold the opposite view. In my opinion, I am convinced that it is the responsibility of both sides to address global warming due to financial and educational reasons.
First and foremost, it has been argued that the financial reason is why I think it is the government that should instil financial resources due to its access and power. Authorities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that deforestation and acid-rains are inextricably bound up. For example, a well-known American environmentalist once said, " governments should initiate environmental mitigation plans to reduce the consequences of acid-rain falling", which had a significant influence on my belief. Thus, beneficial ramifications of investing in new environmental policies can be seen.
Moreover, another factor that should be considered is the educational reason, which in other words, people should be aware of the adverse consequences of the climate change and change their habits. Additionally, fundamental aspects of relocating factories outside of city relate to this reality that factories' fume will be reduced significantly. For instance, some research conducted by Melbourne university has asserted that the reduction of traffic congestions and using public transport are correlated. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of educational development.
To recapitulate, I profoundly believe that people and corporations need to cooperate to tackle environmental issues due to financial and educational reasons. Society should make a concerted effort to address this matter.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, i think, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83928571429 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37517762193 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617857142857 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7554829539 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.769230769 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0879901308297 0.242375264174 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0263339499514 0.0925447433944 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281960540493 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0467749246299 0.151781067708 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00861901042118 0.0609392437508 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.