Climate Change And About The Roles That Government, Corporate And Individuals Can Play To Improve It
Human activities and urbanization are the major reasons of climatic changes, and this is augmenting to the environmental damage. There is always a debate on who should be held responsible to solve this problem. I strongly believe that government, industries, and individuals should work in harmony to combat this climate change. This essay will discuss various points to justify my view point.
Firstly, government should take proper measures to control air pollution, water pollution and soil pollution. Government authorities should enforce stringent laws to limit the emission of carbon monoxide from industries and vehicles and should improve public transportation, thus controlling the air pollution. They should create awareness programs to educate people of the impacts of climatic changes. They should also promote renewable sources of energy by creating campaigns
Furthermore, industries should use bio-degradable products and keep a check on the industrial wastes and should ensure proper disposal of this waste. Finally, individuals should play their role by using reusable products. They should limit the usage of private vehicles and should comply to the government laws.
To conclude, considering all the above points, it is evident that government, industries and individuals should work in harmony to combat climatic changes in the environment, thus creating a better world for our future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 477, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... sources of energy by creating campaigns Furthermore, industries should use bio-d...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 210.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72380952381 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95623404484 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62380952381 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1915730948 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.272727273 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129168570816 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586019481462 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706330905577 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877340243916 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439521186013 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.