Communication has evolved significantly in the last decade. Discuss pros and cons impacts.
Recently, the phenomenon of evolution in communication and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that rapid communications is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that vital development in the field of communication is a plus, and I will analyze it through this essay.
To begin with, from sociological standpoint, social networking is made possible only due to significant improvement in the technology. This provided society with some noticeable effects which is rooted in the fact that formerly people had no idea about the thoughts and daily routine of layman living in the other part of the world, is inextricably bound up. According to my own experience , when I was a university student conducted an academic survey which discovered businesses boomed globally as a result of myriad means of communication. Thus, ramifications of easy, fast and cheap communication can be seen apparently.
On the other hand, within the realm of technological overwhelming people are getting distant from the physically close relations. People sitting in the same room or neighborhood are not very much connected due to electronic communication bombarding. Moreover, fundamental aspects of mobile communication, now an employee is not free even after the working hours and can be contacted via call or email, hence, which is eventually effecting the domestic life.
To recapitulate, while there are compelling arguments, the evolution in field of communication is beneficial but we need to set the limits to avoid the misuse.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...bound up. According to my own experience , when I was a university student conduct...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4842519685 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36975260262 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688976377953 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4078382054 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.636363636 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.25397266985 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0844556125607 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0323992519753 0.0925447433944 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246614388985 0.071462118173 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0494216420207 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222001719922 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.