"Do you think the place where a person grew up helps him/her in achieving objectives in life? Do you agree or disagree
Recently, the phenomenon of individual's achievements and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many, life achievements and personal brought-up is influenced by the locality. Such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by substantial number of people. I am inclined to believe that the area of living implicitly help individual to achieve goals. I will analyze it throughout the essay.
To begin with, the sociological standpoint, Individual's success can provide society with some noticeable effects which is rooted in the fact that glee neighborhood and peaceful environment are inextricably bound up. In my own experience as a university student, I performed an experiment which discovered that individuals from sound locality are more likely to achieve good grade and are confident speaker too . Thus the beneficial ramification of the place on person's life can be seen apparently.
In contrast, within the realm of psychology, slum neighborhood might cause detrimental effect on the personality. Moreover, fundamental aspect of going not so good places relates this reality of demerits of mental disorders. As a tangible example, Harvard University conducted a research which asserted that low objectives of a person's life is correlated negatively with not having proper mentor as well as they opportunities provided in the area . Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of that opportunities are in the place of living .
To recapitulate, although both sides have compelling arguments,I profoundly believe that a person's brought up surroundings does play an imperative role in his success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...good grade and are confident speaker too . Thus the beneficial ramification of the...
^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...d grade and are confident speaker too . Thus the beneficial ramification of the plac...
^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...beneficial ramification of the place on persons life can be seen apparently. In cont...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...which asserted that low objectives of a persons life is correlated negatively with not ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... they opportunities provided in the area . Hence, it is correct to presume the pr...
^^
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ortunities provided in the area . Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceive...
^^
Line 5, column 555, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...opportunities are in the place of living . To recapitulate, although both sides...
^^
Line 7, column 63, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...ugh both sides have compelling arguments,I profoundly believe that a persons broug...
^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...ing arguments,I profoundly believe that a persons brought up surroundings does play an im...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, in contrast, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64682539683 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31098389895 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662698412698 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0966518518 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.461538462 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.33497536946 169% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139322450753 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467169177333 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444504662091 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775115213364 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240476193248 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.