Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Recently, the phenomenon of placing advertisements in public schools and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that it fulfills additional funds. Such issue regarded thoroughly both constructive nd positive by substantialnumber of individuals. I am inclined to believe that advertisements in return of funds is a plus.I will analyze it through this essay.
To begin with, within the realm of psycology, forceful or captive audiance to advertise the product is just below the ethics. Moreover, the fundamental aspect of corporate sponsorship relate to the reality that demerits of young brain washing may occur. As a tangible example, a research paper from prestigious universtiy asserted the downside of publicity in school is correlated negatively with not having complete trust on the management. Hence, it is corrrect to presume the preconceived notion of placing advertizing in a public school.
In contrast, in the sociological standpoint, advertisement in the high school can provide society with some noticeable effects which is rooted in the fact that funds generating is inextricably bound up. In my own experience, on an academic experiment I discovered that getting sponsors increases schools potential in participation of games and other extra-curricular activities, eventually benefitting the pupil. Thus, beneficial ramification can be seen of the advertisements in schools, apparently.
To recapitulate, although both sides have compelling arguments, I profoundly believe that benefits of having sponsorship and advertisements in schools far outweighs its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ng impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that it fulfills addi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...rtisements in return of funds is a plus.I will analyze it through this essay. ...
^
Line 4, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...placing advertizing in a public school. In contrast, in the sociological standpo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, may, moreover, so, thus, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88655462185 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.52018852892 2.71678728327 130% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672268907563 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4778172895 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.75 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189903578465 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611001232847 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381599175768 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101811131527 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248895690588 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.88 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.