Company’s top-level authorities should get their employees into the decision-making process. Discuss?
The most important thing for any employee is to make a decision which has a positive impact on the growth of any organization. Some people believe that top-level authorities should involve their employees in the decision-making process, whereas some tend to believe that involving employees other than top-level authorities can put any organization into any serious risk. I am inclined to believe that top-level employees should not involve their employees in any decision making.
First of all, employees are inexperienced and they are not competent and confident enough to take any decision. Most of the employees will be least qualified and experienced as compared to that of top-level authorities. Recently in an interview Bill Gates confessed that how his team's involvement in the decision-making process nearly put his company shares at risk. Companies generally prefer people with diverse experience.
Second of all, some employees are immature and they do not take things seriously and end up in taking wrong decisions. Researchers believe that employees which are young have a lack of focus and concentration than experienced top-level authorities. Google lost one billion dollars when they purchased Data one technologies a few years back. Timely training and sessions with top-level authorities are very important for any organization to grow.
Sometimes giving decision making the freedom to employees can put the reputation of any organization at stake and there should be zero involvement from any employees in the decision-making process. In my opinion, I believe that top-level employees are competent enough to take any decision for a company which can prove fruitful for the company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one technology', 'a technology', or simply 'technologies'?
Suggestion: one technology; a technology; technologies
...illion dollars when they purchased Data one technologies a few years back. Timely training and s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, whereas, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51330798479 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10973621225 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520912547529 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5266356786 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.538461538 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53846153846 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388120896997 0.242375264174 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145481818981 0.0925447433944 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109749238852 0.071462118173 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253130102591 0.151781067708 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987195807208 0.0609392437508 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.