Company’s top level authorities should get their Employees in decision-making
A company is a place where umpteen employees work in order to enhance their capabilities; it is asserted by many intellectuals that they should be involved in decision-making process of an organization whereas others disagree with these people, and it is believed by them that their participation can create enormous vital issues for an organization; It is conceded by me that their participation in an organization is very essential.
Employees who are considered as an asset for an organization must be involved in the decision making process for innumerable reasons. They will feel motivated if they will be involved in the this process; Their motivation can boom the growth of an organization. As it has been seen, motivated employees work harder in order to fulfill the desired objectives of an organization. Therefore, it can never be denied that their participation is not essential, and it also can never be said that they may not be involved in this process.
Moreover, Employees communicate with the customer in order to understand their choices and tastes; thus, they only will be able to fulfill their desires if top level management will involve them in the decision making process; furthermore, this process will be more convenient and lucrative if they and their suggestions will be addressed in this process; a salesman of company XYZ can be taken as an example who daily sale products to customers door- to-door; thus, customers’ perception can merely be understood by a sale man instead of top level management. Therefore, considering him in the decision making will be prolific for the overall development of an organization.
Therefore, it is being agreed by me that an employees’ participation is an essential for the growth of an organization.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for innumerable reasons. They will feel motivated if they will be involved in th...
^^
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
... motivated if they will be involved in the this process; Their motivation can boom the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a daily'.
Suggestion: who is a daily
... company XYZ can be taken as an example who daily sale products to customers door- to-doo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.5418719212 218% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 6.10837438424 262% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 20.9802955665 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24041811847 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29921185934 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463414634146 0.580463131201 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.5024630542 171% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 164.626660964 50.4703680194 326% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 188.0 104.977214359 179% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.875 20.9669160288 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206271265553 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970666553919 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628557666767 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139684574734 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602765973442 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 12.6369458128 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.49 53.1260098522 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.9458128079 165% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.94827586207 211% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.3980295567 154% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.5123152709 200% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.