Many employers are now offering their employees the option to work from home.As a result, employees will have much more flexible working hours in the future. Is this a positive or negative development?

Essay topics:

Many employers are now offering their employees the option to work from home.
As a result, employees will have much more flexible working hours in the future. Is this a positive or negative development?

These days there is an ongoing debate between people about owners of the companies are allowing their employees to finish job roles from their residential houses. While it is possible to claim that if they provide employees to work from home, it will not be beneficial. In my opinion advantages outweigh the disadvantages. In this essay, I shall elucidate my perspective by evaluating both aspects of the argument.

There are numerous reasons why some people say giving work from home has demerits. The most preponderant one is that employees do not pay very close attention on their work. Another pivotal facet to take into account is that employees do not obey their boss. Needless to say, all these are the drawbacks.

On the other hand, those who advocate that work should be given to employees from home have a different outlook, and say that it can actually be good thing. It is claimed that employees become more productive. Another key justification for upholding this notion is that employees develop their relations quite strong with family members.

While there are strong arguments on both sides of the case, my personal opinion is that this is a positive development if employee completes all job tasks from home.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...arguments on both sides of the case, my personal opinion is that this is a positive development ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, look, so, while, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 8.36945812808 12% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 1207.87684729 86% => OK
No of words: 205.0 242.827586207 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03902439024 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65203501268 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629268292683 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 379.143842365 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1825205639 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0833333333 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350146468849 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118124242078 0.0925447433944 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716678653121 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211915050034 0.151781067708 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287968983613 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 55.0591133005 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.