Company's top level authorities should get their employees in decision making process.
These days there is an ongoing debate between people about top-level authorities should get their employees in the decision-making process or not. while it is possible to claim that new ideas and decision will have impact on company's growth as well employees career. my view is that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. In this essay I shall explain my point of view by analysing both sides of arguments.
there are several reasons why top-level authorities should get their employees in the decision-making process. One of them is that it will improve company's growth by technology wise. it can also be argued with that employees can have a feel of more responsibility in company's growth. it should also be taken into the account today people at age of 14 have ability to run a company. So including employees at decision-making process will help for company's growth.
Those who argue for only top-level authorities should involve in decision-making process may have different view and say that it can be actually a good thing. Firstly, it is claim that taking employees decisions may cause problem at growth due to less experience in decision-making process. Then there are concerns about time consumption when taking employees decision.
while there are strong arguments on both sides of case, my opinion is that including employees decision will lead a healthy environment and improve company's growth. I would strongly recommend that company should take their employees at decision-making process when it is possible will help to growth at financial and technology wise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... in the decision-making process or not. while it is possible to claim that new ideas ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
...mpanys growth as well employees career. my view is that the advantages outweigh th...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...y analysing both sides of arguments. there are several reasons why top-level autho...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ove companys growth by technology wise. it can also be argued with that employees ...
^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...more responsibility in companys growth. it should also be taken into the account t...
^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the account today people at age of 14 have ability to run a company. So includ...
^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to run a company. So including employees at decision-making process will help for...
^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... companys growth. Those who argue for only top-level authorities should involv...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ion when taking employees decision. while there are strong arguments on both side...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, if, may, so, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 6.10837438424 278% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28346456693 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04592129827 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511811023622 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 403.2 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.311803542 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8571428571 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.33497536946 169% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.500265194821 0.242375264174 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191175193813 0.0925447433944 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.190096032402 0.071462118173 266% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.342303940692 0.151781067708 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597122162202 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 12.6369458128 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.32886699507 86% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 55.0591133005 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 59.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.