As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom.
Do you agree or disagree?
The question of whether Information Technology systems will occupy the role of teachers in the classroom has recently sparked heated debate drawing the undivided attention of the public. While some people posit that the machines have enough intelligence to do the job of a teacher, I strongly disagree that computers can not perform the activities of a teacher does. This essay will discuss the reasons of why tutors can not be replaced by computers along with relevent examples.
First and foremost, a human tutor in the classroom enable the students to interact face to face and communicate through his expressions. A computer can never interact with humans by showing expressions along with emotions. For instance, a survey conducted by the University of Melbourne last year revealed that 89% of the students are not able to interact with the machines that replaced their teachers as part of an experiment.
Secondly, questions from students in a classroom are super dynamic and they can never be estimated ahead. An artificial intelligence system can never deal with a situation to answer these dynamic questions, including stupid ones. A robot that has fully programmed with artificial intelligence was introduced in a first grade school in Japan last month and the results were egregious to the scientists as the robot was unable to answer few questions from 4 year old kids.
In conclusion, a fully automated intelligent computers can not replace a traditional process of teaching by a human in a class room as the machines will curb the student-teacher interactions by expressions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether Information Technology systems will occ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast month and the results were egregious to the scientists as the robot was unabl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22178988327 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98055998614 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556420233463 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.5879017503 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.2 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156144390991 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659340355237 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048514002676 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09901891576 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722168846747 0.0609392437508 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.