Problem and benefits of the high school students study plays and the work of the theatres written centuries ago. Discuss and use your own experience.
In modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people on whether the high school students study plays and the work of the theatres is beneficial or not. This essay will first discuss the concerns of it and then discuss benefits out of it. In today's competitive world, everyone is majorly focussing on evolving themselves by learning new technolgoies by spending additional time outside of the class room.
Introducing the ancient plays and pushing the students into theatres to play will not only waste precious time but also lead to low scoring academic results. For instance, a famous high school in Geneva introduce this concept of mandatory plays in theatres last year and ended up having reduction of 33% of pass rate from the high school.
Despite having the above negative side, introducing kids to this old legendary plays will indeed help them to learn the culture and the history. This can help adolescents to compare how the contemporary world has been evolved from a very ancient period and thus help them to deal with their own career growth and strenghten thier character. A study conducted by the University of Melbourne, for example, revealed last year that kids participation in role play activities to act in old stories honed thier behavioral skills.
To conclude, there are several compelling arguments on both sides. Introducing the students to role plays of ancient stories have benefits, such as improving attitude in students, and disadvantages, such as not focussing on what is required.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.140562249 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73228173179 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622489959839 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2394085444 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227052102993 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832527420214 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789353944641 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131881166612 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077966749066 0.0609392437508 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.