do you think cashless society is realistic. what are advantages and disadvantages?
Recently, the phenomenon of making society cashless has triggered a great controversy in the world. Some people argue that a cashless society can be boon for the environment along with people, whereas others reject the notion saying nothing can replace the trust that cash offers. This essay will discuss whether making society cashless is a realistic idea by discussing both advantages and disadvantages.
There are myriad reasons that stem to the fact that a cashless society can be advantageous but the most important one is the way we can save our environment and trees from cutting down. Every year many forests are going down around the world to just cater the requirement of paper for making cash irrespective of currency. For example, a recent study shows that more than ten billion trees are cut down to make the paper required for cash. This is apparent why we should opt for a cashless society.
However, there are pitfalls that negate the argument of a cashless society and most preponderant one was the way cybercriminals are misusing the information to steal the money. There are many complaints raised to the bank on a daily basis on fraud transactions happening using the card details of another person. For instance, recent research says that most of the illiterates were targetted and card details are stolen to withdraw the money. This makes a clear case of why it is important to use cash for all types of transactions.
In conclusion, this essay has discussed both sides of a cashless society on how it can be beneficial in saving trees and detrimental in allowing people to misuse the cards. In my opinion, with proper planning and user education, it is possible to make this society a cashless.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...on, it is possible to make this society a cashless.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93470790378 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73308455483 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549828178694 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4606697103 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.461538462 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149418268792 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618352017379 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532872298731 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104001944473 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492972443733 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.