Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects. Agree or disagree? Advantages or disadvantages?
Recently, the phenomenon of early language learning and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of learning new languages is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that agreeing to learn a foreign language as a child can be a plus for each persons future, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, multilingual people can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact the merits of interpersonal relations, as well as being able to speak to people from different countries, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I carried out an academic experiment which discovered socioeconomic benefits of speaking various languages. Hence, the beneficial ramifications of learning an exotic language apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of lingual development, starting to learn more that one language at an early stage might increase the consequences of delay in proficiency. Moreover, fundamental aspects of cultural heritage relate to this reality that the demerits of personal identity crisis pertain to desolated individuals. As a tangible example, some scientific experiment undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of speaking more that two languages correlate negatively with clinical depression. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of adversity of focusing on language learning.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of knowing foreign languages prove the significance of social and economical capabilities, but also pinpoint securing children's future implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... profoundly believe that the benefits of far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70103092784 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25814517367 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 139.433497537 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642611683849 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3421406886 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.25 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244577668167 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754742404311 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476060344492 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123584599307 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550501643909 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.