Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products?" Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.

The issue of the over packaged product is raising tremendously during the last few decades. Although, companies claim that it provides extra safety to the products, this extra plastics damage environment severely. This has raised the following question that: should we blame producers or customers? In my point of view, both producers and consumers should take responsibility to reduce the use of plastics.

To begin with producers, they are the utmost responsible for this because they are the only one who produces over packaged products, especially, food products. They know that it is extremely hazardous for the environment but they state that it is important to keep food safe and hygienic from bacteria and microbuses. Also, most of the time they do intensely because fancy and colourful over packaged products attract customers so much.

From the consumer’s point of view, they also equally responsible because people are so busy in their jobs nowadays even they don’t have time to choose the products so they measure the quality of products on the basis of packing if packing looks good means product is ok. Probing further, Children are attracted mostly toward colouring or over packing of products so they force their parents to buy.

To conclude, Producers and consumers both should have to take responsibility for this serious issue, after all, “it takes two to make a quarrel”. Also, the government should take strong action against companies that produce over packaged products.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'means'' or 'mean's'?
Suggestion: means'; mean's
... basis of packing if packing looks good means product is ok. Probing further, Childre...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, after all, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35416666667 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79135259427 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579166666667 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7779748318 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.818181818 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259395489937 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10371448755 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488840409434 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161183953512 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323584144876 0.0609392437508 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.