Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
Today, over-packaging products are flooding the markets. Since over packaging cost the consumers as well as the Environment. There is an urgent need to curtail its usage. It is a producer’s responsibility to reduce the packaging product. Producer should work towards both cost saving and damage environment. This essay will explore both side the statements and upcoming the next paragrapg before a particular conclusion.
To begin with, over packaging often shoot up the products price significantly. Therefore, less packaging will automatically pull the rate downwards. For example, MacDonald pack their burger in a paper wrap and then put it in a cardboards container and then hand it to customers in paper bags. Instead, if they only put it in a box and they will reduce the burger price.
To the other hand, over packaging is a significant catalyst for environment damage as it augments co2 emission. So it is a producer’s responsibility to minimal use harm to the ecosystem. For instance box packaging cost trees which is not only costs buyers and sellers but the whole planet. So it is the best interest of everyone minimal use packaging products. Producers should avoid all packaging products and goods.
To sum up, as aforementioned, I think over packaging is very bad effects on environments. So it is a producer’s responsibility to avoid the packaging products and goods in the market. Over packaging is very harm to our ecosystem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Mahdi_Farhani | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | lovepreetdhillon | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? 77
- Personal development is the base of professional development and advancing on one's career. To what extent do yo agree and disagree? 22
- The claim that animal have rights has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s Are zoos helping or hurting our animals should zoos be banned do you agree or disagree 75
- Polygamy has increased widely in recent year. What solutions can you brought forward to decrease this issue? 55
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 227, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cardboards'' or 'cardboard's'?
Suggestion: cardboards'; cardboard's
...er in a paper wrap and then put it in a cardboards container and then hand it to customers...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i think, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19491525424 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28832124236 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550847457627 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.9 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.5024630542 63% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.7847523816 50.4703680194 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.1111111111 104.977214359 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.1111111111 20.9669160288 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344031736634 0.242375264174 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128976843629 0.0925447433944 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120573776136 0.071462118173 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222671162846 0.151781067708 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782949835619 0.0609392437508 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 12.6369458128 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.9458128079 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.93 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.94827586207 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.3980295567 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.