Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products, or is it the responsibility of producers?
The vast growth in technological advancements in many areas, should have bought more efficient techniques to avoid waste or carbon foot prints. But, some of them have created a lot of problems in-spite of its benefits. One such example is the recent evolution in logistics and food delivery systems which use over packaged products that is unavoidable in most of the circumstances. My opinion in this case is, the producers must always look for a way to decrease these over packaged products. The reason and examples and the resolution steps are explained in this essay.
First of all, most of the people in these days are always going for online shopping which had led to the increase in product delivery management for the safe delivery of items which is possible only with perfect packaging. This resulted in increase in wastage like paper and plastic bags and containers.Secondly, even food items purchased from local vendors comes from rich polythene bags. This again contributed more due to the accumulation of carbon foot prints.
Further, some of these disposal of packaging are non bio-degradable which affects the planet in its significant way. It is always the responsibility of producers to find some possible ways to eradicate this issue.
In conclusion, producers must go for packaging with degradable and recycled bags for packaging instead of polythene. Even though, it is the responsibility of producers for delivering the rightly packaged stuffs, consumers also have the major responsibility by bringing their own bags while shopping. Hence, my opinion always goes with the responsibility of producers to find alternate way with the co-ordination from consumers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Secondly
...e paper and plastic bags and containers.Secondly, even food items purchased from local v...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vendors'' or 'vendor's'?
Suggestion: vendors'; vendor's
...y, even food items purchased from local vendors comes from rich polythene bags. This ag...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tributed more due to the accumulation of carbon foot prints. Further, some of ...
^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this disposal' or 'these disposals'?
Suggestion: this disposal; these disposals
...carbon foot prints. Further, some of these disposal of packaging are non bio-degradable whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, while, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30597014925 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07233467665 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563432835821 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4473087665 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.384615385 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201707029957 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680020973592 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664308155791 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117282089949 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782345507181 0.0609392437508 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.