Do you think consumers should avoid purchase of over packaged products or it is the responsibility of producers to avoid extra packaging of products. Give your views with any relevant example of your own experience.
At the present times, there is an ongoing argument about people who must abstain from buying excessively packed items or it may be the duty of the manufacturers to prevent this circumstance to happen. In my perspective, it is a concern for both parties due to helping the environment for the former and considering alternatives for the latter. This essay will discuss further my stance about the foregoing issue.
To begin with, commodities nowadays are being overly packed just to make it appealing to the customers. However, it is still the choice of individuals to patronize such goods. As a result, they will be only just getting the product inside the package and immediately throwing away the packaging material. To illustrate, mobile phone are packed excessively containing each of its parts and then later on be found on garbages adding pollution to the ecosystem without any further use besides initially handling such valuable product.
On the other hand, it can also be pointed out to the makers of certain marketable product to consider other substitute raw materials to be used for packaging. They should be the frontliners when it comes to environmental considerations. Modification of packaging design should be timely evaluated as a means to reduce solid wastes. For example, products can now be wrapped with biodegradable plastics instead of several layers of cartons.
In conclusion, the tendency of consumers to spend money on large packagings can be prevented through being more involved in the environment. Moreover, for the industries further alternative packaging materials should be studied upon to lessen land wastes. Indeed, it is a two-way process between both sides to achieve cleaner surroundings.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, for example, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31272727273 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01878197757 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8909532679 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.357142857 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.25397266985 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103623539761 0.242375264174 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394898042399 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380989730553 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0656053564072 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391214656355 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.