Do you think formal written assessments in today's world to assess students’ performance is effective or not? Discuss your viewpoint on this and support your answer with examples.
The importance of formal written assessment, which was always debated, has become now more controversial. The substantial effects of students' performance has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on formal written assessment's on today's world in recent years. It can be agreed that written examination has positive aspects, but some people claim that it has some negative impacts as well. This essay will elaborate how formal written assessments in today's world to assess students' performance and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why formal written assessments are enough, but the most conspicuous one steam from the fact that theoretical knowledge is most important. Theoretical knowledge teaches about particular course and subjects. For example, engineer student learn about engineering and its concept but they won't have practical knowledge apart from little bit. Thus, student learn and understand all basic fundamental related to physics, science, maths, and drawing.
Moreover, written assessment will only test about theory. For instance, student are forced to learn particular amount of technology. They won't have any idea outside their textbooks.
On the contrary, some people adopted an opposing view and tend to believe that written exams just check memory power. Students will be learning and understanding about the topics which will be tested in final exam. An illustration, anyone can get any degree who has good memory power regardless of technical knowledge. Thus, written exams are not enough to check student's performance.
From what has been discussed, it can be concluded that the impact of written assessments in today's world to assess students' performances prominent but there are number of drawback should not be overlooked. I personally support written assessments which is better than others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t can be agreed that written examination has positive aspects, but some people cl...
^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ont have practical knowledge apart from little bit. Thus, student learn and understand all...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 364, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
..., written exams are not enough to check students performance. From what has been dis...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, moreover, so, thus, well, apart from, for example, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57586206897 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8139895976 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0016531799 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1176470588 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 2.91625615764 309% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252440285079 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834958582017 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914483759231 0.071462118173 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14755352111 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100546046266 0.0609392437508 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.