Recently, the phenomenon of music in children's learning has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question" Is certain types of music is beneficial to young children’s learning? ". Whereas it is a widely held view that music is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational reform standpoint, musical educations are bound up inextricably with the learning process of children, which indicates they lead to both learning efficiency and a specific kind of music. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between music-based education and music-oriented methods as well as an exponential increase in the impact factor among children. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to education policies and educational development alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of primary school children's interest is correlated positively with not only musical instruments but also musical contents.
Within the realm of learning general-psychology, without the slightest doubt, music-based education attribute to stimulating creativity, in that it would come down to systematic education and music-minded children. A salient example of such attribution is learning process, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take educational inequalities for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint children's development problems. Hardly had they confined their attention to listening and even playing a musical instrument. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of music-oriented learning method.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes" All's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly agree that the role of certain types of music in children's learning process is highly beneficial.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes' Alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1207.87684729 145% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93220338983 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41684826324 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 139.433497537 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633898305085 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7111461408 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.833333333 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357272896236 0.242375264174 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124878416863 0.0925447433944 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119327957956 0.071462118173 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246445795744 0.151781067708 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940579927157 0.0609392437508 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 12.6369458128 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.41 11.5310837438 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.