Recently, the phenomenon of online books and information has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question" Has the value of printed books diminished? ". Whereas it is a widely held view that printed books are highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the academic standpoint, the hardcopy versions are bound up inextricably with the most common format, which indicates they lead to both book accessibility and book affordability. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists demonstrates the relationship between online bookstores and online versions as well as an exponential increase in the rate of inadequacy. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to periodicals and magazines alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of the per capita studying rate is correlated positively with not only easy-to-access books but also reliable resources of information.
Within the realm of sociology, Without the slightest doubt, reading books attribute to the society's general wisdom, in that it would come down to rationality and cognition in society members. A salient example of such attribution is the political knowledge, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take invaluable publications for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint journals censoring problems. Hardly had they confined their attention to journals independence and even liberty. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of the printed version of publications.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes" all's well that ends well, " after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that printed books are valuable resources and are not faded away.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69932432432 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24377634977 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662162162162 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6569160814 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.769230769 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233607551231 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620976582709 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855810691839 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156693690307 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108149266981 0.0609392437508 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 55.0591133005 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.