Recently, the phenomenon of roads and the public transport has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question" Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?". Whereas it is a widely held view that the public transport is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, different forms of public transport are bound up inextricably with transportation convenience, which indicates they lead to both public transport reforms and transportation policies. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between the road quality and an upsurge in gasoline consumption as well as an exponential increase in traffic jams. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to transportation accessibility and subsidies alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of reliable transportation is correlated positively with not only high-quality vehicles but also transportation regulations.
Within the realm of economy, without the slightest doubt, the transportation budget efficiency attribute to public services, in that it would come down to the bus and taxi. A salient example of such attribution is cost-efficient bus lanes, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take private cars for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint the shipment problems. Hardly had they confined their attention to transit and even export. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of an integrated road network.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes" all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the government should emphasize on the public transport.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes' alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1207.87684729 144% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77408637874 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41227875728 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 139.433497537 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65780730897 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6909141431 50.4703680194 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.692307692 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367081213293 0.242375264174 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09994561353 0.0925447433944 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161558887924 0.071462118173 226% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217656450774 0.151781067708 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.192707739504 0.0609392437508 316% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.