Recently, the role of medical technology in helping people to live longer has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind?". Whereas it is a widely held view that the media technology is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the health and treatment standpoint, different technologies of medicine production are bound up inextricably with longer ages, which indicates they lead to both healthier lifestyle and more accessible treatments. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists demonstrates the relationship between chemical medicines and treatment methods as well as an exponential increase in medical policies. Their academic criticism was impressive. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to hospitals and special cliniques alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of medical evolution is correlated closely with not only life expectancy but also physical well-being.
Within the realm of sociology, without the slightest doubt, long-term living attribute to the effective healthcare system, in that it would come down to the social health status and medicine costs. A salient example of such attribution is the public health service, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take the preliminary health care for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint therapists accessibility problems. Hardly had they confined their attention to medical reforms and even medicine educations. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of the medical industry.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes" all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly agree that d impact of medical technology is profusely positive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 460, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'therapists'' or 'therapist's'?
Suggestion: therapists'; therapist's
...ht have had the opportunity to pinpoint therapists accessibility problems. Hardly had they...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes' alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... elaborated above, I firmly agree that d impact of medical technology is profusel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1207.87684729 145% => OK
No of words: 304.0 242.827586207 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76644736842 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16661180366 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 139.433497537 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677631578947 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 379.143842365 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8210056105 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.214285714 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269182073096 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645822606936 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934583870069 0.071462118173 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148525826893 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10254943107 0.0609392437508 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 55.0591133005 218% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.