Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic ? Support your opinion with examples.
The new phenomenon of studying while working is highly controversial with many people claiming that such idea has become prevalent today. Although others think that work and study should not be mixed together, I believe that this has some real benefits and can make a person more marketable in the long run. This essay will discuss on both sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are various reasons why people should distinguish between study and employment. First and foremost, most young adults are unable to balance the work and study time. Managing time from a busy schedule is a hard task and that is why they fail to complete their studies. Moreover, those who are new to this trend could not cope with long commuting hours, familial responsibilities and cut-throat competition at work. Thus, it is apparent that people should either focus on academics or their job life.
However, people who argue on effective learning techniques balance their argument on the challenges which study and employment together bring to a person. Undoubtedly, it makes a person more balanced, disciplined and determined in his later lives. Furthermore, people who want to attain higher or professional degrees are able to complete their studies because of the heavy tuitions fees they pay from their salaries. Hence, managing studies with work is an advantageous task for people both mentally and financially.
This essay discussed the potential benefits of balancing work with studies to gain real-life experiences and how it can lead to pressure and burden on the people. In my view, the impact of involving study with employment can make a person more professional and specialized which is suited to his long-term career.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14385964912 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74608425994 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589473684211 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1118235249 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.714285714 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164933470789 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611187610658 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409534413811 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105926017061 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168540619442 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.