Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples.

Nowadays, there is a colossal upsurge in a trend to see that people take the full time or part time job while persuading their academic degrees. Prodigies argue that earning while learning is not a good combination as students cannot concentrate on any of these. However, rest advocates otherwise. My viewpoints coincide with the latter group. In this essay, I shall provide constructive arguments on both the side and a lead to a plausible conclusion.

At the outset, there are myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. The most conspicuous one is that enriching oneself with practical experience while studying would enhance the level of knowledge. Not only the training will broaden the horizon of a person but it will also succour in paying the exorbitant fees for their educational courses, which is become troublesome for financially struggling parents to pay. Needless to mention, all these merits stand an individual and his family in good stead as far as their economic condition is concerned.

However, on the flip side, critics argue that taking employment while studying will work as a distraction. Moreover, greed to earn more will motivate aspirants to work overtime and would create a shortage of time for study. Further, less time to complete the complex and lengthy course material will generate unnecessary stress which would hamper the level of the output of the student.

To recapitulate, from the above-mentioned arguments, one can conclude that though few downsides of the working while still continuing with the study overwhelms the potential benefits of this concept, the alertness of the students about prioritizing the options will definitely work as ripping the merits out of it.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
... in a trend to see that people take the full time or part time job while persuading their...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...o see that people take the full time or part time job while persuading their academic deg...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, still, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23188405797 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86086919813 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626811594203 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.1845411931 50.4703680194 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.076923077 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 7.25397266985 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107646407119 0.242375264174 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355078095585 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363000026542 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650000281931 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129162437004 0.0609392437508 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.