In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. Discuss your opinions and give examples.

Nowadays, there has been a colossal upsurge to see that a tourism has become a booming industry, be it in an affluent or impoverished nation. However, the phenomenon of tourism in developing countries and its corresponding effects has sparked a heated debate. In this essay, I shall elaborate both merits and demerits of this contentious topic.

At the outset, there are myriad of advantages which can be associated with the development of tourism industry in developing countries. The most conspicuous one is that it is the biggest source of generating revenues for the individuals and the governments. Not only it broadens the person’s mind and reduces the culture shock but it also makes people less prejudiced and enables them to interact more. In addition, tourism plays a vital role in strengthening the healthy relations among countries which will keep the developing countries at the preponderant position.

On the flip side, increasing flux of tourist works as ruining the aesthetic value of traditional art forms. Moreover, it leads to accumulation of waste and due to inadequate disposal system, environment and public health are put at risk. Furthermore, anti-social elements use the anonymity prevailing at tourist sport to perpetrate criminal activities like terrorism, a great concern for every civil society. International visitors also bring along the new chronic epidemics that disturb the health system of the entire nation and prove to be fatal.

To recapitulate, from above-mentioned arguments, it can be concluded that tourism industry works as an economy booster and proffers the opportunities to learn about innumerable cultures; joint efforts from tourist, local citizens and government are needed to ensure that demerits of this shining industry do not overwhelm the potential benefits of it.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, moreover, so, then, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49116607774 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12153165044 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643109540636 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5511747892 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10539465876 0.242375264174 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341533218204 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455708747323 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0602565556548 0.151781067708 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264891277427 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.