Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? Pros & Cons.
Nowadays, there has been a colossal upsurge in a trend to see that traditional libraries are adopting the technological advancements in making the information on myriad topics available to their users. However, like any other inventions, even this trend carries positive and negative sides of it. I shall discuss them in the following essay.
At the outset, there are myriad of benefits which can be attributed to the usage of digital gadgets by the library to provide information on various topics. To begin with, today’s user has become technologically advanced and thus he will feel more comfortable & convenient in using digital media like CDs, DVDs, or pen-drive to carry information. Not only digitalization will reduce the mammoth cost of new and updated books to the library but it will also proffer the convenience in storing and keeping the track of the e-books.
On the flip side, working on the digital media demand a technically sound staff, which will cost an extravagant amount to the library in terms of their salary. Moreover, such digitalization would require a heavy maintenance which can be much higher then what a traditional library system would need. Furthermore, technology is most vulnerable to change every now and then and thus call for the continuous update that could be a matter of concern for the librarians. In addition, non-tech savvy users will not be able to adapt to the technology.
To recapitulate, from the above-mentioned pros and cons, it can be concluded that in this technical era, even libraries owe to be using digital media to provide information on various topics, care must be taken to see that extra cost and efforts to be put do not become the hindrance in the functioning of the library.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'higher than'?
Suggestion: higher than
...e a heavy maintenance which can be much higher then what a traditional library system would...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...vy maintenance which can be much higher then what a traditional library system would...
^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...technology is most vulnerable to change every now and then and thus call for the continuous update...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, moreover, so, then, thus, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06920415225 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98212869569 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.558465806 50.4703680194 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.181818182 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21900470997 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716487767287 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071767801536 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126964799065 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549400518457 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.