Nowadays, there has been a colossal trend to see that traditional teaching method through books is being replaced by the practical exposure to the theoretical aspects. There are myriad academics who believe that modern way of teaching creates marvelous effects in terms of learning, while rest advocate otherwise, stating that theory is the fundamental base of any concept. My viewpoint coincides with the former group and in this essay, I shall elaborate the key points favoring the above-mentioned statement.
There is a deluge of arguments which can be attributed to the practical aspect of teaching. The most conspicuous one is that it enriches the learners with the deep knowledge about the theory. Not only it will give the exposure to the real application of the idea but it will also make the concept easy to understand and memorize for the longer period. Moreover, it proffers the interesting way to learn which would, in turn, encourage students to go in further detail and have the expertise in that particular topic.
Another pivotal aspect of my argument is that gaining a knowledge of the subject through practical projects will augment the chances of being employed by high profile corporate as they value the experience more than having only a degree attained through theoretical approach. However, on the flip side, a theory is considered as the basic fundamental of a particular concept and hence one need to study it thoroughly to specialize in this particular field.
To recapitulate, from the above outlined arguments, one can conclude that though traditional method of teaching and learning helps to clear the basic understanding of the subject, the tremendous benefits which a learning through experience provides are too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s particular field. To recapitulate, from the above outlined arguments, one c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25704225352 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8853372588 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588028169014 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.598657703 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.3 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4 20.9669160288 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106048571707 0.242375264174 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338702742531 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395648234467 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0601247193678 0.151781067708 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283980785122 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.1260098522 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.