Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
In recent years there has been a colossal upsurge among prodigies discussing the influence of the architecture of the building on the people’s lives across the globe, be it in the affluent nation or impoverished one. In this essay, I will elaborate the effects which a perfectly designed structures would have on workforce.
At the outset, there are myriad of benefits which can be attributed to the design of the building. Firstly, people working in the well-designed building feel proud and have a positive attitude towards the work. Not only does it contribute to the one’ psychological needs but the carefully architected structure with all the basic amenities like safety also empowers the persons working in the building. Thus, needless to say, all these associated merits of the building will have far-reaching positive effect when it comes to one’s psychological needs.
To embark this, other pivotal facets of the argument is that penetration of natural sources such as air and sunlight in the building can have the profound effect on the employees. Besides, unlike the electric c light and air-conditioner air, the maximum touch of the natural sources keep inevitable diseases away, which otherwise could have worst effects on the health and production capacity of the staff. To exemplify, as per the recent survey, Vitamin D deficiency which occurs due to the lack of exposure to the sunlight could lead to health hazards. Hence it hardly needs to mention that the properly structured construction keep individuals in a preponderant position, as far as the positive energy and health is concerned.
To recapitulate, one can conclude that the design of a building enables people to stay healthy and safe, and benefits associated with this are too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lectric c light and air-conditioner air, the maximum touch of the natural sources...
^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the worst'.
Suggestion: have the worst
...le diseases away, which otherwise could have worst effects on the health and production ca...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... sunlight could lead to health hazards. Hence it hardly needs to mention that the pro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, thus, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22916666667 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95705338769 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576388888889 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.0116079984 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.909090909 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282995432443 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107425941993 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968274705205 0.071462118173 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16897670404 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941886850919 0.0609392437508 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.