Nowadays, there is a colossal upsurge in a trend to see that citizens emphasize on government to construct new roads and bridges to alleviate the traffic jams created by private vehicles. However, this concept would add further to the burning question of environment degradation. I am in the opinion that rather network of public transport should be strengthened to accommodate more passengers. In this essay, I shall discuss the key points on both the sides with a plausible conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of merits which can be attributed to the improved network of public transport. The most conspicuous one is that with more people using public transport to commute, less traffic would be generated. Not only this concept would make the travelling fast due to less traffic but it will also save tons of fossil fuel which is a scarce resource of any nation, be it an affluent or impoverished nation. Needless to mention, all these merits stand the ecosystem of the nature in good stead as far as pollution is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of my argument is that efficient public transport would encourage private car owners to switch to the mode of transport from person vehicle to government transport as it proffers the advantages like convenience and affordability. However, on the flip side, usage of more private vehicles would lead to some perennial issues like wastage of natural resources, which are used to manufacture the vehicles and, proper recycling and disposal of used cars.
To recapitulate, from the above-mentioned arguments, one can conclude that, to reduce the problem of traffic and pollution, improving public transport has a far-reaching impact on the government and society as a whole. Hence, merits of strengthened public transport are too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19453924915 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94354701161 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58361774744 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8946210523 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.833333333 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.91666666667 7.25397266985 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308895390221 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102664481111 0.0925447433944 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909385769511 0.071462118173 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172696810526 0.151781067708 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316401668569 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.