Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of effective learning and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although challenged by many that the matter of the career future is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am willing to believe that the focus oriented activity can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social point of view, the combination of study and employment can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that learning disorder, as well as learning capabilities, are inevitably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered high qualifications. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the comfort zone and the internship apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the career vision, learning environments might increase the consequences of learning achievements. Moreover, fundamental aspects of high employment rates would relate to this reality that the demerits of the work-life balance pertain to working experiences. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the high gross salary is correlated negatively with the career opportunity. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of an educated employee.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of quality study time far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the study and work combinations prove the significance of job satisfaction, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57677902622 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27969724716 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640449438202 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3240374645 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.083333333 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155731021587 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479749043917 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570845410687 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879449591844 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521989709872 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.