The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems…so who do you think should be responsible for solving it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual?
Recently, the phenomenon of putting environment in danger and its corresponding impacts has attracted numerous controversies and drawn the attention from the public. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by substantial number of individuals. In my opinion, I am convinced to believe that solving environmental issues by governments rather than organizations and people could be a plus, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
Form the general standpoint, tackling environmental problems by governments could provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment discovered current policies. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of public arena, developments in solving environmental issues by governments might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both side, I profoundly hole the view that the benefits of governments activities on environmental problems far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of this unique way of tackling issue prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng environmental problems by governments could provide the society with some noti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91287878788 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35963922685 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662878787879 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4279340503 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.909090909 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.065096077911 0.242375264174 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0225163085991 0.0925447433944 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255290014312 0.071462118173 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0367877563058 0.151781067708 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256628401861 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.